understanding reliability and validity in quantitative research

It is evident that replication of any qualitative methods will not release the same results due to changing contextual conditions. The third debate reported in the literature was the discussion about reliability in qualitative research.

It is concerned with cooperation of the multiple constructed realities to reach the contextual truth. Reality is not fixed in qualitative research. Qualitative research does not accept a single truth. This is due to epistemological grounds of qualitative research. There are various interpretations of what validity is in qualitative research. Another important discussion in social inquiry was about what valid research means in qualitative paradigm. peer debriefing, member check, audit trail) are used after completing the data collection procedures. Most of the strategies in qualitative research (e.g.

The first one was about qualitative inquirers’ limited emphasis on the data collection process to increase the robustness of their research efforts. The researcher examined the arguments about validity and reliability in inquiry methodology and identified three main debates primarily in qualitative research. The purpose of this paper is discussing the main issues in conceptualizing reliability and validity between qualitative and quantitative research approaches.

Understanding reliability and validity in quantitative research